Thanks for all this work Rayya!
Guy and I have been putting our heads together!
Our suggestion is to make a much briefer statement and have the bulk of yours - which is very well and cogently put - made into a link together with some other links t…
Unfortunately, Andrew's general comments have been used to imply that this was what Haringey social workers were doing (we don't actually know this) and it is in danger of being used to disparage solution focused practitioners as irresponsible Polly…
Carl
I think there are a couple of misleading threads in your comments.
Peter's mother was not receiving therapy; she agreed to a single session for a purpose to do with Sue Gilmour's needs more than her own (though I imagine she and everyone else t…
Sue was nothing to do with the case except for the one-off interview. The actual worker may or may not have attended one of the introductions to signs of safety and/or solution focused practice that we ran for haringey in that period.
Another comment: as far as I know we do not know what Peter's social worker did or didn't do so your comments about this, Paul are confusing. I don't think we should comment on her. The point is that Sue's one-off session was entirely seperate from…
Paul Z Jackson said:Great stuff, Rayya. A suggested redraft of the first 3 paras, below:We, the members of the United Kingdom Association of Solution Focused Practice, were deeply saddened by news of the death of Baby P. We'd like to respond to some…
There is confusion here. Sue Gilmore was not the child protection worker for baby Peter nor was the case allocated to her team. As part of her Diploma course she was required to submit recording of a whole session with a client. A parallel team to h…
Hi Chris.
Come on. Let's have a photo of you.
I wonder about the usefulness of this site.
Can't imagine that it will get used.
Anyway we will see.
Evan